Polarization transfer observables in elastic electron-proton scattering at Q2=2.5, 5.2, 6.8, and 8.5 GeV2 POLARIZATION TRANSFER OBSERVABLES in ELASTIC ... A. J. R. PUCKETT et al.

Simple item page
creativework.publisherAmerican Physical Societyrevtex@aps.orgen
dc.contributor.authorPuckett A.J.R.
dc.contributor.authorBrash E.J.
dc.contributor.authorJones M.K.
dc.contributor.authorLuo W.
dc.contributor.authorMeziane M.
dc.contributor.authorPentchev L.
dc.contributor.authorPerdrisat C.F.
dc.contributor.authorPunjabi V.
dc.contributor.authorWesselmann F.R.
dc.contributor.authorAfanasev A.
dc.contributor.authorAhmidouch A.
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak I.
dc.contributor.authorAniol K.A.
dc.contributor.authorArrington J.
dc.contributor.authorAsaturyan A.
dc.contributor.authorBaghdasaryan H.
dc.contributor.authorBenmokhtar F.
dc.contributor.authorBertozzi W.
dc.contributor.authorBimbot L.
dc.contributor.authorBosted P.
dc.contributor.authorBoeglin W.
dc.contributor.authorButuceanu C.
dc.contributor.authorCarter P.
dc.contributor.authorChernenko S.
dc.contributor.authorChristy M.E.
dc.contributor.authorCommisso M.
dc.contributor.authorCornejo J.C.
dc.contributor.authorCovrig S.
dc.contributor.authorDanagoulian S.
dc.contributor.authorDaniel A.
dc.contributor.authorDavidenko A.
dc.contributor.authorDay D.
dc.contributor.authorDhamija S.
dc.contributor.authorDutta D.
dc.contributor.authorEnt R.
dc.contributor.authorFrullani S.
dc.contributor.authorFenker H.
dc.contributor.authorFrlez E.
dc.contributor.authorGaribaldi F.
dc.contributor.authorGaskell D.
dc.contributor.authorGilad S.
dc.contributor.authorGilman R.
dc.contributor.authorGoncharenko Y.
dc.contributor.authorHafidi K.
dc.contributor.authorHamilton D.
dc.contributor.authorHiginbotham D.W.
dc.contributor.authorHinton W.
dc.contributor.authorHorn T.
dc.contributor.authorHu B.
dc.contributor.authorHuang J.
dc.contributor.authorHuber G.M.
dc.contributor.authorJensen E.
dc.contributor.authorKeppel C.
dc.contributor.authorKhandaker M.
dc.contributor.authorKing P.
dc.contributor.authorKirillov D.
dc.contributor.authorKohl M.
dc.contributor.authorKravtsov V.
dc.contributor.authorKumbartzki G.
dc.contributor.authorLi Y.
dc.contributor.authorMamyan V.
dc.contributor.authorMargaziotis D.J.
dc.contributor.authorMarsh A.
dc.contributor.authorMatulenko Y.
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell J.
dc.contributor.authorMbianda G.
dc.contributor.authorMeekins D.
dc.contributor.authorMelnik Y.
dc.contributor.authorMiller J.
dc.contributor.authorMkrtchyan A.
dc.contributor.authorMkrtchyan H.
dc.contributor.authorMoffit B.
dc.contributor.authorMoreno O.
dc.contributor.authorMulholland J.
dc.contributor.authorNarayan A.
dc.contributor.authorNedev S.
dc.contributor.authorNuruzzaman
dc.contributor.authorPiasetzky E.
dc.contributor.authorPierce W.
dc.contributor.authorPiskunov N.M.
dc.contributor.authorProk Y.
dc.contributor.authorRansome R.D.
dc.contributor.authorRazin D.S.
dc.contributor.authorReimer P.
dc.contributor.authorReinhold J.
dc.contributor.authorRondon O.
dc.contributor.authorShabestari M.
dc.contributor.authorShahinyan A.
dc.contributor.authorShestermanov K.
dc.contributor.authorŠirca S.
dc.contributor.authorSitnik I.
dc.contributor.authorSmykov L.
dc.contributor.authorSmith G.
dc.contributor.authorSolovyev L.
dc.contributor.authorSolvignon P.
dc.contributor.authorSubedi R.
dc.contributor.authorTomasi-Gustafsson E.
dc.contributor.authorVasiliev A.
dc.contributor.authorVeilleux M.
dc.contributor.authorWojtsekhowski B.B.
dc.contributor.authorWood S.
dc.contributor.authorYe Z.
dc.contributor.authorZanevsky Y.
dc.contributor.authorZhang X.
dc.contributor.authorZhang Y.
dc.contributor.authorZheng X.
dc.contributor.authorZhu L.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-10T14:27:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-10T14:48:57Z
dc.date.available2024-07-10T14:27:04Z
dc.date.available2024-07-10T14:48:57Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-06
dc.description.abstractBackground: Interest in the behavior of nucleon electromagnetic form factors at large momentum transfers has steadily increased since the discovery, using polarization observables, of the rapid decrease of the ratio GEp/GMp of the proton's electric and magnetic form factors for momentum transfers Q21 GeV2, in strong disagreement with previous extractions of this ratio using the traditional Rosenbluth separation technique. Purpose: The GEp-III and GEp-2γ experiments were carried out in Jefferson Laboratory's (JLab's) Hall C from 2007 to 2008, to extend the knowledge of GEp/GMp to the highest practically achievable Q2 given the maximum beam energy of 6 GeV and to search for effects beyond the Born approximation in polarization transfer observables of elastic ∫ - p scattering. This article provides an expanded description of the common experimental apparatus and data analysis procedures, and reports the results of a final reanalysis of the data from both experiments, including the previously unpublished results of the full-acceptance dataset of the GEp-2γ experiment. Methods: Polarization transfer observables in elastic ∫ - p→∫ - scattering were measured at central Q2 values of 2.5, 5.2, 6.8, and 8.54 GeV2. At Q2=2.5GeV2, data were obtained for central values of the virtual photon polarization parameter ϵ of 0.149, 0.632, and 0.783. The Hall C High Momentum Spectrometer detected and measured the polarization of protons recoiling elastically from collisions of JLab's polarized electron beam with a liquid hydrogen target. A large-acceptance electromagnetic calorimeter detected the elastically scattered electrons in coincidence to suppress inelastic backgrounds. Results: The final GEp-III data are largely unchanged relative to the originally published results. The statistical uncertainties of the final GEp-2γ data are significantly reduced at ϵ=0.632 and 0.783 relative to the original publication. Conclusions: The final GEp-III results show that the decrease with Q2 of GEp/GMp continues to Q2=8.5GeV2, but at a slowing rate relative to the approximately linear decrease observed in earlier Hall A measurements. At Q2=8.5GeV2, GEp/GMp remains positive but is consistent with zero. At Q2=2.5GeV2, GEp/GMp derived from the polarization component ratio R-Pt/P shows no statistically significant ϵ dependence, as expected in the Born approximation. On the other hand, the ratio P````/P````Born of the longitudinal polarization transfer component to its Born value shows an enhancement of roughly 1.7% at ϵ=0.783 relative to ϵ=0.149, with ≈2.2σ significance based on the total uncertainty, implying a similar effect in the transverse component Pt that cancels in the ratio R.
dc.identifier.doi10.1103/PhysRevC.96.055203
dc.identifier.issn2469-9993
dc.identifier.issn2469-9985
dc.identifier.scopusSCOPUS_ID:85033682789en
dc.identifier.urihttps://rlib.uctm.edu/handle/123456789/448
dc.language.isoen
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85033682789&origin=inward
dc.titlePolarization transfer observables in elastic electron-proton scattering at Q2=2.5, 5.2, 6.8, and 8.5 GeV2 POLARIZATION TRANSFER OBSERVABLES in ELASTIC ... A. J. R. PUCKETT et al.
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.issue5
oaire.citation.volume96
Files
Collections
Articles